Friday, April 5, 2013

A Woman in the NBA: Why Mark Cuban's Dallas Mavericks Would Draft Baylor Star Brittney Griner

What are the odds Brittney Griner stays in Texas with the Dallas Mavericks? (tvweek.com)

Brittney Griner has been an enigma in college basketball since her freshman year in 2009-10. She has a list of achievements to her name that most players — male or female, NCAA or NBA — will never fathom, let alone accrue. Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban knows this. That's why Cuban mentioned he may steer the team toward drafting the Baylor post player, if she is the best option on the board this summer. But not to be overlooked is the caveat that Cuban acknowledged: the financial coup of marketing the NBA's first female player.

See, Cuban is a businessman first and foremost. That is what allows him to be an NBA owner. The fact that he happens to be a good one is a direct reflection of his business acumen and intense interest in his investment. When he spoke about taking a flyer on Griner as a draft pick, Cuban did so knowing the Mavs will likely miss the playoffs after a predictably rocky season; that his team will soon be out of the headlines as its already aging star player comes off a campaign in which he missed nearly 30 games to injury; that even with possibility of a future with O.J. Mayo as a first scoring option and the fully realized potential of Jae Crowder, the Mavericks are not a particularly attractive franchise right now.

Enter the idea of drafting one of the most dominant players in NCAA women's basketball history. An all-conference and All-American selection several times over, a four-time Big 12 Defensive Player of the Year, and an Olympian before college graduation, Griner would seem to have the easiest transition to make for any woman hoping to play in the NBA to date.

Ann Meyers, a former UCLA guard, tried out for the Indiana Pacers in 1979, when the pro game was much different than it is in the league's current iteration. At 5'9", 134 pounds, Meyers would have been out-muscled and outmatched, a common argument against the idea of a woman playing any professional sport alongside men. However, that is not the exact case being leveraged against Griner. The Baylor star is 6'8", 208 pounds, according to last summer's Team USA roster.

A survey of every NBA player on an opening night roster in 2007-08 returned an average height of 6'6.98" and a mean weight of 221 pounds, putting Griner an inch above most Association players, albeit slightly leaner. There have been plenty of skinny NBA players — Tayshaun Prince and Kevin Durant, to be current; Reggie Miller, Manute Bol to drop names — that overcame their perceived disadvantage to make professional careers, be it with unorthodox or traditional, one-dimensional or well-rounded skill sets.


Griner's issue would not be a physical unpreparedness, but rather a need to change the fundamental basics of her game. She would have to learn to guard players on every inch of the court, not just the interior. Her scoring prowess has been predicated on muscling through defenses in the low post, being able to dunk over the usual women's NCAA ilk. Griner would not be able to do this against players like Tyson Chandler or Zach Randolph. With an improvement in lateral quickness, Griner could use her already solid footwork to score in the paint, but she could not feast there like she has while at Baylor. Even in the midst of the positional revolution, Griner would be more suited to play as a small forward than in the four or five spot in the NBA. Furthermore, she would need to greatly improve her ball-handling and extend the range of her jumper, moving outside of the 10-foot arc surrounding the basket. Griner has been reliable from 3-point range, shooting 40 percent from downtown through four years, but going two-of-five from long range through 148 games is not exactly a large sample size. If her jump shot is true, it is not unthinkable that Griner could become a spot-up option in the NBA, particularly as a complement to a slashing guard or on possessions against zone defenses.

First, though, Griner has to enter the NBA Draft and get selected. Cuban properly summed up her stock:
"Right now, I'd lean toward yes, just to see if she can do it. You never know unless you give somebody a chance, and it's not like the likelihood of any late-50s draft pick has a good chance of making it."
The hypothetical if of drafting Griner is compounded by where she would be picked. Draft picks, especially those in the first round, are more valuable than ever under the new CBA, but a "late-50s" pick relegates her to one of the last five spots, which rarely produce viable players from the droves of men's college players or the overseas stock. Fairly, if she was the best option available, this is where Griner would be chosen. It is where history would be made. She would proceed to go through the normal rigors of an NBA freshman, attending the NBA rookie symposium and possibly playing in the summer league. The latter is something Cuban is also aware of, saying "That'd sell out a few games."

He's right, of course. Assigning her to the Mavs' D-League affiliate would do the same for the Texas Legends, a team experienced in making splashy moves. Bringing her onto an NBA roster would do the same. To the general public, Griner would be a novelty until she proved she could compete and, based on Dallas' roster management in recent years, Griner could very well be an option for the Mavericks if she proved herself to Cuban.

On paper, Cuban can break down a defense. He knows what Griner would need to do to help the Mavericks win. Cuban can also break down an expense report and a budget, and he knew exactly what he was doing when he mentioned a chance of the Mavs drafting Griner. It created a buzz about a floundering franchise and executing such a plan would attract a previously unmined interest in attending games, whether they are in the Las Vegas summer league or on Dallas' home court.

Beyond the questions of "Could she compete with men?" and "Could she get drafted?" is another, less bandied but equally buzzworthy query: "Why would an NBA team draft Brittney Griner?" Cuban knows the answer to this question and he knows it is not all about which remaining player is best on draft night.

Follow @BeatsDimesDrive on Twitter
Like Beats Dimes and Drives on Facebook

VIDEO: Detroit's Doug Anderson Steals Show At Dunk Contest

Two days before the Final Four tips off, fans in Atlanta were treated to a show thanks to Detroit's Doug Anderson.

ESPN.com - YouTube

Anderson won the college slam dunk contest with an incredible display of athleticism and leaping ability. Make sure to watch every dunk, because the final one at the 53-second mark has to be a candidate for dunk of the year.

It is also similar to the dunk thrown down by No. 1 high school recruit Andrew Wiggins at the McDonalds All-American game earlier this week, which shows amazing athletic potential and has to make his college suitors even more excited about landing this kid.

Ballislife - YouTube

Follow @BeatsDimesDrive on Twitter
Like Beats Dimes and Drives on Facebook

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Wichita State Is Better Than A Cinderella

Wichita State is in the Final Four as a No. 9 seed, but don't confuse them with a Cinderella. (usatoday.com)

The Wichita State Shockers are a No. 9 seed in the Final Four, but don't call them Cinderella. This is more a goal than a fairy tale for the Shockers.

Sure, not many were picking Wichita State to be in Atlanta, but this is not a team that came out of nowhere from a no-name conference to steal the spotlight and pull a few upsets.

The Missouri Valley Conference has a great track record of getting teams into and winning games in the NCAA Tournament. Wichita went overlooked in the regular season because the MVC also has a mid-major powerhouse and national player of the year candidate with Doug McDermott at Creighton. The Shockers also didn't play the toughest schedule, but did beat VCU on the road and Creighton when the Blue Jays were ranked No. 12.

Still, if this is the first you're hearing of them, you weren't paying close enough attention.

No, this isn't a Cinderella. This is a team built for success in March. 

This is a team that expects to win and will come out hitting teams in the mouth, which is evident in its strong, tough play. The physicality is most notable in the rebounding category, where the Shockers ranked No. 27 in the country this year with 38.4 per game, yet the two forwards logging the most minutes are only 6-foot-8. Carl Hall is the leading board grabber on the team, averaging 7.2 rpg, and Cleanthony Early is second with just over five, only accounting for about 31 percent of the team's average rebounds. Head coach Gregg Marshall has made rebounding a team effort and fundamental instilled in every player.

This is a team with senior leadership from Hall and Malcolm Armstead – who paid his own way to WSU by working at a car dealership – a junior in Cleanthony Early, who made the most of his junior college days getting better. Also logging key minutes are a pair of freshmen, Fred Van Vleet and Ron Baker, who have shown no fear of the big stage in the tournament. Armstead was the third-leading scorer on the team during the regular season, averaging 10.9 ppg, yet has been the leading scorer in three of the four NCAA Tournament games.

This is a team that has been efficient on offense, not shooting less than 35 percent from the field since the tourney began and not turning the ball over more than 15 times in a game. The Shockers will need that efficiency against Louisville, which will be by far the toughest defense the Shockers have faced this season.

This is a team that, like fellow Final Four contenders Louisville and Syracuse, had a three-game losing streak at some point in the regular season, yet regained momentum toward the end of the season and never lost faith. The schedule is long and the play of the first part of the season is almost irrelevant. What matters is now, and the Shockers are as good as anyone in the country.

This is not a team like many high seeds that find success; it's not an undersized, scrappy group that relies on making a ton of 3-pointers to stay in the game. Wichita State has strong players that will battle inside but can score in a variety of ways and can suffocate opponents on the defensive end.

The Shockers do have one quality in common with typical Cinderellas; they don't see themselves as underdogs. This team knows it can beat you and that kind of confidence can go a long way.

But no, this isn't Cinderella. This is a Wichita State team that has dominated its run to the Final Four by playing like the power teams.

This is a team built for success in March and has proven it.

Follow @BeatsDimesDrive on Twitter
Like Beats Dimes and Drives on Facebook

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Andrew Wiggins and the Mid-Major Dream

Mid-dunk, McDonald's All-American Andrew Wiggins ponders his college options. (McDonald's via SBNation)

The NCAA Tournament has been whittled to four remaining teams and the NBA regular season is wrapping up. Andrew Wiggins will make his way, quickly, through the collegiate ranks and play on basketball's biggest stage as soon as fall 2014. Right now, though, Wiggins is a senior at Huntington Prep in Huntington, West Virginia.

The 18-year-old small forward was originally on track to leave high school in 2014, but reclassified to finish a year early — and with good reason. Wiggins is 6'7", 205 pounds and immediately passed fellow recruits Jabari Parker and Julius Randle to become the top prospect in the 2013 high school class and a very early projection as the No. 1 overall pick in the 2014 NBA Draft. His picked up national momentum after ripping opponents in tournaments last summer and has since established his status by doing things like throwing down between-the-legs, 360 dunks at the McDonald's All-American game.

Although Wiggins isn't tipping his hat toward which college program will land him, none of his suitors are in the Final Four. Two were eliminated before the Elite Eight (Kansas and North Carolina) while the other two finalists (Kentucky and Florida State) fell outside the March Madness bubble. Wiggins' parents both attended Florida State as student-athletes, and the Seminoles are a quietly understood frontrunner despite their blue-blood competition.

What no one is talking about is a possible darkhorse entering the Andrew Wiggins sweepstakes late: the Wichita State Shockers. That's fair because, even though his brother Nick Wiggins is a reserve guard for WSU and the Shockers' Cinderella run to the Final Four will surely put them in the hunt for better recruits in the near future, Andrew Wiggins is not going to play out his (probably) lone college season at a mid-major in the heartland. A high major program with sterling history that happens to reside on the bountiful Kansas plains, such as KU, has a legitimate chance to snag such a recruit, but Wichita State does not.

That isn't to take away from the program. Like Mark Turgeon before him, head coach Gregg Marshall has done a fantastic job building the Shockers and raising their national profile. Occasionally a highly touted recruit will opt to play for a smaller program for one reason or another, but this late in the game — Wiggins has already visited three of the four contending schools and will announce his decision before May 15 — Wichita State has no chance. Even Nick is prodding his younger brother in other directions.

There are no murmurs about Andrew Wiggins suiting up in black and yellow like his brother because such things are beyond the scope of rational thought. Andrew Wiggins is the kind of player who stars at a traditionally premier program before moving on to an inevitable career in the NBA. That much we know before he even graduates from high school, and that's fine. The Shockers have a shot a national championship. Making the Final Four is an accomplishment for any team, let alone one that was slated to finish third in their non-power six conference in preaseason polls. Adding the top recruit of the incoming freshman class would undoubtedly be a windfall for Wichita State. It won't happen.

But it's a nice daydream.


Follow @BeatsDimesDrive on Twitter
Like Beats Dimes and Drives on Facebook

Going Pro: Who Is Leaving Early To Enter The NBA Draft

The next few weeks will be filled with college players leaving early to enter the NBA Draft in June. (pistolsfiringblog.com)

With the college basketball season over for all but four teams, now begins the whirlwind of players putting their names in the hat for the 2013 NBA Draft. Check back with the blog regularly to see which names are added to the list as the April 16 early entry deadline nears.

Players leaving school early for the NBA Draft
Newest additions in italics 

Steven Adams - freshman center, Pitt
C.J. Aiken - junior forward, St. Joseph's
Anthony Bennett - freshman forward, UNLV
Vander Blue - junior guard, Marquette
Lorenzo Brown - junior guard, NC State
Reggie Bullock - junior forward, UNC
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope - sophomore guard, Georgia
Michael Carter-Williams - sophomore guard, Syracuse
Allen Crabbe - junior guard, Cal
Jamaal Franklin - junior forward, San Diego State
Archie Goodwin - freshman guard, Kentucky
Tim Hardaway Jr. - junior guard, Michigan
Myck Kabango - sophomore guard, Texas
Shane Larkin - sophomore guard, Miami 
Ricky Ledo - freshman guard, Providence
Alex Len - sophomore forward, Maryland
C.J. Leslie - junior forward, NC State
Amath Mbaye - junior forward, Oklahoma
Ben McLemore - freshman guard, Kansas
Tony Mitchell - sophomore forward, North Texas
Eric Moreland - sophomore guard, Oregon St.
Shabazz Muhammad - freshman forward, UCLA
Nerlens Noel - freshman forward, Kentucky
Victor Oladipo - junior guard, Indiana
Kelly Olynyk - junior forward, Gonzaga
Norvel Pelle - freshman forward/center, Iona (although never played for team)
Otto Porter - sophomore guard, Georgetown
Marshawn Powell - junior forward, Arkansas
Phil Pressey - junior guard, Missouri
Tony Snell - junior guard, New Mexico
Isaiah Sykes - junior guard, Central Florida
Adonis Thomas - sophomore guard, Memphis
DeShaun Thomas - junior forward, Ohio State
B.J. Young - sophomore guard, Arkansas
Cody Zeller - sophomore forward, Indiana

Follow @BeatsDimesDrive on Twitter
Like Beats Dimes and Drives on Facebook

NCAA Alumni Bracket: This Year's Sweet 16 All-Time Teams Part 1

We're finally getting close to figuring out who the best college basketball team of the year is as we move into the Final Four. No doubt the alumni of each team still in the tournament are anxiously watching to see how the tournament unfolds.

But what if those alumni that are feverishly watching were able to, for just one weekend, regain their youthful body and lace up their shoes just one last time to compete in the ultimate alumni bracket? Watching the greatest players duke it out one last time would make for one exciting weekend.

I've compiled some of the greatest alumni for the first half of this year's Sweet 16 teams below and have asked Alex, Kyle, and Dakota to vote on who they feel would move on for each match up. Here are the results:

Louisville:

Point Guard: LaBradford Smith ‘88-’91
Shooting Guard: Darrell Griffith ‘77-’80
Small Forward: Billy Thompson ‘83-’86
Power Forward: Pervis Ellison ‘86-’88
Center: Wes Unseld ‘65-’68 
_____________________________________________________

Oregon:

Point Guard: Aaron Brooks ‘04-’07
Shooting Guard: Ron Lee ‘73-’76
Small Forward: Luke Jackson ‘01-’04
Power Forward: Greg Ballard ‘74-’77
Center: Blair Rasmussen ‘82-’85
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

Result -
Louisville: 3
Oregon: 0


Darrell Griffith (Via. uoflcardbook.com)


















_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

Michigan State:
 
Point Guard: Magic Johnson ‘78-’79
Shooting Guard: Steve Smith ‘88-’91
Small Forward: Greg Kelser ‘76-’79
Power Forward: Johnny Green ‘56-’59
Center: Paul Davis ‘03-’06
_____________________________________________________

Duke:

Point Guard. Bobby Hurley. ‘90-’93
Shooting Guard: JJ. Redick ‘03-’06
Small Forward: Shane Battier ‘98-’01
Power Forward: Christian Laettner ‘89-’92
Center: Mike Gminski ‘77-’80
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

Result -
Duke: 3
Michigan State: 0

Laettner (Via. buffalosportshalloffame.com)


















_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

Wichita State:

Point Guard: Warren Armstrong ‘65-’68
Shooting Guard: Cleo Littleton ‘52-’55
Small Forward: Xavier McDaniel ‘82-’85
Power Forward: Cliff Levingston ‘80-’82
Center: Dave Stallworth ‘62-’65
_____________________________________________________

La Salle:

Point Guard: Larry Cannon ‘66-’69
Shooting Guard: Tom Gola ‘52-’55
Small Forward: Lionel Simmons ‘87-’90
Power Forward: Michael Brooks ‘77-’80
Center: Larry Foust ‘47-’50
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

Result -
Wichita State: 2
La Salle: 1
 
Xavier McDaniel (Via. blogs.kansas.com)

















_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

Arizona:

Point Guard: Mike Bibby ‘96-’98
Shooting Guard: Miles Simon ‘95-’98
Small Forward: Sean Elliott ‘85-’89
Power Forward: Chris Mills ‘89-’93
Center: Bob Elliott ‘74-’77
_____________________________________________________

Ohio State:

Point Guard: Robin Freeman ‘53-’56
Shooting Guard: Jim Jackson ‘90-’92
Small Forward: John Havlicek ‘60-’62
Power Forward: Gary Bradds ‘62-’64
Center: Jerry Lucas ‘60-’62
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

Result -
Ohio State: 2
Arizona: 1

Havlicek (Via Ohio State Athletics)














In the coming days we will be taking a look at the other half of the Sweet 16 as we continue our mission to crown the alumni bracket champions.

Follow @BeatsDimesDrive on Twitter
Like Beats Dimes and Drives on Facebook

Monday, April 1, 2013

Louisville Rallied Together After Kevin Ware's Injury


Louisville players advanced to the Final Four in honor of Kevin Ware, who broke his leg during the game. (boston.com)

The country shuttered at the sight of it. CBS stopped showing replays, and for good reason. It was the kind of sight that makes your stomach churn and your body hurt at the thought of it.

It didn't matter what happened up until that point in the Louisville/Duke game because it wouldn't compare to what was witnessed on live TV at the 6:33 mark of the first half.

Louisville sophomore Kevin Ware jumped to contest a shot on a Duke shooter, a standard play, and when he landed, his leg broke in two places and the bone had protruded from his skin. It was a gruesome and horrific sight that is a thankfully seldom but unfortunate consequence of playing sports. Ware was taken off on a stretcher and to a local hospital for surgery. All the while his teammates, coaches and everyone watching had to recover and finish the game.

His teammates and coaches were visibly shook up. Tears ran down faces and the game was far behind the concern for their friend's health in their minds. The game could have unfolded in two ways; either the effect of the injury and nine-minute delay put the Cardinals in an understandable fog and their heads would not come back in the game, or they would come out fighting for the player who could no longer be on the court with them and keep the season alive.

That's what Ware wanted. He kept saying so while lying on the court. His leg was broken in two places and he just kept telling his team to win. Lousiville did win, 85-63, out scoring the Blue Devils 50-31 in the second half after being only up three at halftime. Russ Smith had a team-high 23 points while Gorgui Dieng chipped in 14 points, 11 rebounds and four blocks.

Out of a horrific incident came the inspiration that sports can provide. Louisville players saved an open seat on the bench for Ware after he left for the hospital and celebrated with his jersey after the game. Ware's team rallied behind him and did not mask how painful it was for them to see him lying on the court.

The bond of teammates is strong. These guys spend nearly every day together, growing as basketball players and men. Regardless of alliances, it was difficult not to appreciate the Cardinals playing for their teammate who was on everyone's mind in the second half.

Just like their warmup shirts, Louisville rose to the occasion and out of a negative consequence of sport came a powerful benefit of being a team.